On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 20:15 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > +/* Push all tasks that we can to other CPUs */ > +static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *this_rq) > +{ > + while (push_rt_task(this_rq)); > +} I'd like to see an additional termination condition to this loop (might just be paranoia though).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] RT: Add support for low-priority wake-up to push_rt feature
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] RT: Add support for low-priority wake-up to push_rt feature
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] RT: RT-Overload/Sched enhancements (v2)
- From: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 5/7] RT: Add support for low-priority wake-up to push_rt feature
- From: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/7] RT: RT-Overload/Sched enhancements (v2)
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23.git build error
- Next by Date: dontdiff update needed
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/7] RT: Add support for low-priority wake-up to push_rt feature
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/7] RT: Add support for low-priority wake-up to push_rt feature
- Index(es):