Re: [PATCH] sched: Rationalize sys_sched_rr_get_interval()

[Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>]

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 12-10-2007 00:23, Peter Williams wrote:
> ...
> > The reason I was going that route was for modularity (which helps when 
> > adding plugsched patches).  I'll submit a revised patch for consideration.
> ...
>
> IMHO, it looks like modularity could suck here:
>
> > +static unsigned int default_timeslice_fair(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > +	return NS_TO_JIFFIES(sysctl_sched_min_granularity);
> > +}
>
> If it's needed for outside and sched_fair will use something else
> (to avoid double conversion) this could be misleading. Shouldn't
> this be kind of private and return something usable for the class
> mainly?

This is supplying data for a system call not something for internal use 
by the class.  As far as the sched_fair class is concerned this is just 
a (necessary - because it's need by a system call) diversion.

> Why anything else than sched_fair should care about this?

sched_fair doesn't care so if nothing else does why do we even have 
sys_sched_rr_get_interval()?  Is this whole function an anachronism that 
can be expunged?  I'm assuming that the reason it exists is that there 
are user space programs that use this system call.  Am I correct in this 
assumption?  Personally, I can't think of anything it would be useful 
for other than satisfying curiosity.

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/