Re: [PATCH try #2] Input/Joystick Driver: add support AD7142 joystick driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/07, Ahmed S. Darwish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 01:29:31PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't disabling device interrupts from the begining of the ISR "ad7142_interrupt"
> > > till the kthread "ad7142_thread" got waked-up and scheduled a long time,
> > > espicially if there's a high load on the userspace side ?
> > >
> >
> > It is OK - you disable a specific interrupt line preventing it from
> > raising any more IRQs until current one is serviced.
>
> Won't this affect system responsiveness if the IRQ line was shared ?

You are right, this would not work in case of shared IRQs. Hovewer
this driver is for an embedded arch and the line is not shared.

>
> >
> > This is different from disabling interrupts on CPU.
> >
>
> mm, Why disabling interrupts in general. Doesn't IRQ hanlers of the same kind got
> executed in a serialized fashion even on SMPs ?. If so, why not just wakeup our
> custom-thread or use workqueues and let them do their business ?

Because you don't want CPU to be continually interrupted while untill
right thread gets scheduled. I think using work[queue] is the best
solution for this driver, but you still want to mask that particular
IRQ off until you do the read.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux