Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * René Rebe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus et al.,
>>
>> 2.6.23 does not build with my usual .config on x86_64 and gcc-4.2.1:
[]
> your superblock build failure would be a new and so far unknown build
> breakage variant - please send the .config you used, and double-check
> that it's indeed a vanilla 2.6.23 tree.
It's not a vanilla 2.6.23. In vanilla 2.6.23 there's no lines about
which it complains (struct super_block isn't mentioned in mm.h at all).
It's some external patch that used to work with 2.6.22 but needs to be
updated for 2.6.23 - in my case it was unionfs.
/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
