Re: [BUG] The return of the sysfs oops

Chris Rankin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Do you remember that oops in sysfs a few versions ago? (Kernel bug 8198) Well, it's baaaack in
> 2.6.22.9...

This isn't really related to sysfs.  It seems module count was too low
and went away while there still were holders.  What were you doing when
it happened?  Can you reproduce it?

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUG] The return of the sysfs oops
  - From: Chris Rankin <[email protected]>

References:
- [BUG] The return of the sysfs oops
  - From: Chris Rankin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: remove zero_page (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
Next by Date: Re: [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack
Previous by thread: [BUG] The return of the sysfs oops
Next by thread: Re: [BUG] The return of the sysfs oops
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]