On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:44:04AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Greg KH <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I would be interested in seeing what your patches look like.
>
> Sure.
>
> > I don't
> > think that we should take any more sysfs changes for 2.6.24 as we do
> > have a lot of them right now, and I don't think that Tejun and I agree
> > on the future direction of the outstanding ones just yet.
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> > But I don't think that your multiple-mount patches could make it into
> > .24, unless .23 is still weeks away.
>
> Well I have posted them all earlier. At this point I it makes most
> sense to wait until after the big merge happen and every rebases on
> top of that. Then everyone will have network namespace support and
> it is easier to look through all of the patches. Especially since
> it looks like the merge window will open any day now.
>
> I will quickly recap the essence of what I am looking at:
> On directories of interest I tag all of their directory
> entries with which namespace they belong to. On a mount
> of sysfs I remember which namespace we were in when we
> mounted sysfs. The I filter readdir and lookup based upon
> the namespace I captured at mount time. I do my best
> to generalize it so that the logic can work for different
> namespaces.
Ok, I have no objection to that. Let's wait for 2.6.24 to settle down
:)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]