Re: [PATCH 0/5] RT: scheduler fixes and rt_overload enhancements

On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:33 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:

> On the flip side:  Perhaps sending a reschedule-ipi that doesn't
> reschedule is simply misused, and the misuse should be cleaned up
> instead? 

It basically does TIF_WORK_MASK and TIF_NEED_RESCHED is one of the most
frequently used of those. Using it for any other bit in that mask is
IMHO not abuse.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] RT: scheduler fixes and rt_overload enhancements
  - From: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] RT: scheduler fixes and rt_overload enhancements
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] RT: scheduler fixes and rt_overload enhancements
  - From: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] maintainers: kbuild is subscribers-only
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RT: scheduler fixes and rt_overload enhancements
Next by thread: [RFC PATCH RT] push waiting rt tasks to cpus with lower prios.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]