On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 02:30 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 06:15:51PM -0700, Tim Pepper wrote: > > > > When a read() requests an amount of data smaller than the amount of data > > that the seq_file's foo_show() outputs, the output starts looping and > > outputs the "stuck" element's data infinitely. There may be multiple > > sequential calls to foo_start(), foo_next()/foo_show(), and foo_stop() > > for a single open with sequential read of the file. The _start() does not > > have to start with the 0th element and _show() might be called multiple > > times in a row for the same element for a given open/read of the seq_file. > > > > static void *l_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) > > { > > - struct lock_class *class = m->private; > > + struct lock_class *class; > > + loff_t i = 0; > > > > - if (&class->lock_entry == all_lock_classes.next) > > + if (*pos == 0) > > seq_printf(m, "all lock classes:\n"); > > Do not generate output outside of ->show() and you won't have these > problems. That's where your infinite output crap comes from. > > IOW, NAK - fix the underlying problem. FWIW I had to do Tim's bits too. Just moving all output from the start into the show method didn't fix it. Signed-off-by: Tim Pepper <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> --- kernel/lockdep_proc.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep_proc.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep_proc.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep_proc.c @@ -23,32 +23,25 @@ #include "lockdep_internals.h" -static void *l_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) +static void *l_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) { - struct lock_class *class = v; - - (*pos)++; - - if (class->lock_entry.next != &all_lock_classes) - class = list_entry(class->lock_entry.next, struct lock_class, - lock_entry); - else - class = NULL; - m->private = class; + struct lock_class *class; + int i = 0; - return class; + list_for_each_entry(class, &all_lock_classes, lock_entry) { + if (i++ == *pos) + return class; + } + return NULL; } -static void *l_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) +static void *l_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) { - struct lock_class *class = m->private; - - if (&class->lock_entry == all_lock_classes.next) - seq_printf(m, "all lock classes:\n"); - - return class; + (*pos)++; + return l_start(m, pos); } + static void l_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { } @@ -101,10 +94,16 @@ static void print_name(struct seq_file * static int l_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { unsigned long nr_forward_deps, nr_backward_deps; - struct lock_class *class = m->private; + struct lock_class *class = v; struct lock_list *entry; char c1, c2, c3, c4; + if (WARN_ON(class == NULL)) + return 0; + + if (&class->lock_entry == all_lock_classes.next) + seq_printf(m, "all lock classes:\n"); + seq_printf(m, "%p", class->key); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP seq_printf(m, " OPS:%8ld", class->ops); @@ -522,28 +521,19 @@ static void seq_header(struct seq_file * static void *ls_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) { struct lock_stat_seq *data = m->private; + struct lock_stat_data *iter; - if (data->iter == data->stats) - seq_header(m); - - if (data->iter == data->iter_end) - data->iter = NULL; + iter = data->iter + *pos; + if (iter >= data->iter_end) + iter = NULL; - return data->iter; + return iter; } static void *ls_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) { - struct lock_stat_seq *data = m->private; - (*pos)++; - - data->iter = v; - data->iter++; - if (data->iter == data->iter_end) - data->iter = NULL; - - return data->iter; + return ls_start(m, pos); } static void ls_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v) @@ -553,8 +543,15 @@ static void ls_stop(struct seq_file *m, static int ls_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { struct lock_stat_seq *data = m->private; + struct lock_stat_data *iter = v; + + if (WARN_ON(iter == NULL)) + return 0; + + if (iter == data->iter) + seq_header(m); - seq_stats(m, data->iter); + seq_stats(m, iter); return 0; }
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Escaping the arguments of kernel messages for sane user-space localisation
- Next by Date: [PATCH] ramdisk: fix zeroed ramdisk pages on memory pressure
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Avoid /proc/lockdep & lock_stat infinite output
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Avoid /proc/lockdep & lock_stat infinite output
- Index(es):