Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:30:54 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:43:10PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > + (e) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are
> > +     public and that a record of the contribution (including my Reviewed-by
> > +     tag and any associated public communications) is maintained
> > +     indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or
> > +     the open source license(s) involved.
> 
> Is this paragraph really necessary?  (For example, is there some history
> of problems that this is addressing?)

It was added between 1.0 and 1.1 to ensure that there were no awkward
interactions with various privacy and data protection laws by making sure
the submitter understands it is a public record and is contributing on
that basis.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux