On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > -ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
> > -CROSS_COMPILE ?=
>
> Can you do this in a way that there are still these ARCH/CROSS_COMPILE
> lines that are just overriden when empty or have their default value?
>
> This way defaults could be still patched in for special cases.
If it is OK to drop the $(SUBARCH) assingment like this then yes.
ARCH ?=
CROSS_COMPILE ?=
I was wondering why we had the empty CROSS_COMPILE assigment and this
explains why.
But why patch something in here in the fisrt place?
It seems to be a workaround for the actual issue this patch addresses - no?
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
