Re: [PATCH RT] fix rt-task scheduling issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guys,
  Nice find!  Comment inline..

(adding linux-rt-users)

 for reference to

 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/8/252

On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:46 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rc9-rt2/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc9-rt2.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc9-rt2/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2207,7 +2207,7 @@ static inline void finish_task_switch(st
>  	 * If we pushed an RT task off the runqueue,
>  	 * then kick other CPUs, they might run it:
>  	 */
> -	if (unlikely(rt_task(current) && prev->se.on_rq && rt_task(prev))) {
> +	if (unlikely(rt_task(current) && rq->rt_nr_running > 1)) {
>  		schedstat_inc(rq, rto_schedule);
>  		smp_send_reschedule_allbutself_cpumask(current->cpus_allowed);

the current->cpus_allowed I think probably should have been
"prev->cpus_allowed" in the original code?  However, in light of the new
findings with this bug Mike found, this should probably be sent to
allbutself() without the mask since you don't know what could have been
queued behind you.

Unless I am missing something?

Regards,
-Greg


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux