Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> And it'd be nice to have a tag for those sorts of
> contributions, partly just as another way to ackowledge them.

Yes, although the primary purpose of the various tags should be to
document the quality assurance process, or how to call it.

However, what belongs into the SCM changelog, and what can the list
archives provide?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-=- -=---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux