Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Oct 8 2007 19:37, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> snip...
>>
>> Or maybe we need something much less formal that explain the purpose of the
>> four tags we use:
> 
> At least formal try:
> 
>> Signed-of-by:
> 
> * Used by original submitter(s).
> * Also used by maintainers to track the patch's path
>   (ATM, does not imply "I have look at it in depth")

Signed-off-by (as far as the Developer's Certificate of Origin defines
it) says:  I made sure that this patch complies with all involved licenses.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-=- -=---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux