Re: [patch 0/9] compat_ioctl: introduce block/compat_ioctl.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:12:18 +0100

> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:19:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This is my block ioctl series split up into managable chunks. I'm not
> > really sure about the last two of these, I'd prefer to get a second
> > opinion on those.
> > 
> > Please apply once your tests have gone though.
> 
> BTW, one note: 0x1260 thing (
>        /* The mkswap binary hard codes it to Intel value :-((( */
>        case 0x1260:
>        case BLKGETSIZE:
> ) is an ancient piece of BS.  It had appeared in 2.1.115-pre3 and AFAICS
> it's a misunderstanding.
 ...
> IOW, that stuff is useless and always had been.  In the current form it's
> simply invalid C on e.g. amd64 - you get duplicate case there, which breaks
> the build.
> 
> I'd simply kill that.

Agreed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux