On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the > revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert > is for the affected hardware and new X.org.. No regressions is more important than making new X.org bits work. I'll make sure that any future fixes for this are tested against older X versions before having them sent along. -- [email protected]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"
- From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
- Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"
- References:
- G33 graphics broken after 2.6.23-rc6
- From: Matthew Reppert <[email protected]>
- Re: G33 graphics broken after 2.6.23-rc6
- From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
- Re: G33 graphics broken after 2.6.23-rc6
- From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
- Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"
- From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
- Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"
- From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
- Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- G33 graphics broken after 2.6.23-rc6
- Prev by Date: Re: [code] Unlimited partitions, a try
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
- Previous by thread: Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"
- Next by thread: Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"
- Index(es):
 |