Re: [PATCH 0/5] forcedeth: several proposed updates for testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: [email protected], Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] forcedeth: several proposed updates for testing
From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:24:20 -0400
Cc: LKML <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)

Jeff Garzik wrote:

The goals of these changes are:
* move the driver towards a more sane, simple, easy to verify locking
  setup -- irq handler would often acquire/release the lock twice
  for each interrupt -- and hopefully


 s/and hopefully//   (it became the next bullet point)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] forcedeth: several proposed updates for testing
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] forcedeth: several proposed updates for testing
Next by Date: Re: apparently missing include/linux header files
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] forcedeth: several proposed updates for testing
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] forcedeth: several proposed updates for testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux