On 10/5/07, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote:
> The original idea (selectively compile out printk() instances based on log
> level to conserve space) is explicitly not addressed by this patch, and in
> fact this patch might actually make it harder to implement (by complicating
> the code).
This is wrong. The patch provides log-level-based filtering at compile
time, effectively making the kernel smaller.
> *shrug* That doesn't mean my objections are important to anyone else, just
> that I don't personally see any reason to be enthusiastic about this patch.
I agree; you are right about the other things, Maybe I can try to fit
some of these things into printk itself (thanks for the tip, Alan),
and we'll see how far we can get.
Thanks.
Vegard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
