On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:28:45 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) ((u64)-1 >> (64 - (n)))
> >
>
> Yeah, that's cleaner.
>
Well yes, but DMA_BIT_MASK(0) invokes undefined behaviour, generates a
compiler warning and evaluates to 0xffffffffffffffff (with my setup).
That won't be a problem in practice, but it is strictly wrong and doesn't set
a good exmaple for the children ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
