Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?

On Friday, 5 October 2007 18:27, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP?
> > 
> > Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power .
> 
> Ok, perhaps, a "select" would be better?...

Select doesn't work really well.

It probably would be better to add something like APM_SUSPEND
depending on SUSPEND.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1
• Next by Date: Reloading DVB drivers broken since 2.6.22, worked in 2.6.21
• Previous by thread: Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
• Next by thread: can't change euid 0 to uid != running user
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]