Re: [PATCH] Fix blktrace setup 32-bit ioctl on 64-bit kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 04 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007, you wrote:
> > This looks a lot better! I don't mind seperating the block bits, when we
> > get the whole bunch in there. Just seemed overly silly and complicated
> > to do it for just one ioctl command. When you are happy with this patch,
> > I'll add it to the pending block stuff for 2.6.24. The blktrace fix
> > isn't a regression so need not go into 2.6.23.
> 
> ok.
> 
> > It seems some bits are missing though (like BLKTRACESETUP32), did you
> > send the whole thing?
> 
> I did the large patch on top of the blktrace patch I sent earlier,
> so it doesn't apply cleanly. When doing the final version, I'll use
> a more sensible patch order.

Ah I see, can you generate one against current git?

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux