Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:15! on 2.6.23-rc8/rc9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



gurudas pai wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.

Is it possible you can strace to find the arguments for the
remap_file_pages that goes wrong?
Ahh, I think it's just underflowing the preempt count somewhere, which
is leading highmem.c:15 to just *think* it is in an interrupt.

But you aren't running a preemptible kernel, which makes it unusual...
it would have to be coming from interrupt code (or just random corruption).
Still, preempt debugging should catch those cases as well.

So, can you disregard my last message, and instead compile a kernel
with CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, and see what
messages come up?
With CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT set I got following messages on
rc9.

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: oracle/3631
caller is kunmap_atomic+0xb/0x82
 [<c04ec241>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xa1/0xb4
 [<c0420dd0>] kunmap_atomic+0xb/0x82
 [<c045fae3>] __do_fault+0x55/0x35b
 [<c04623e8>] handle_mm_fault+0x4d0/0x909
 [<c0460624>] follow_page+0x1d9/0x228
 [<c0462a71>] get_user_pages+0x250/0x332
 [<c0462bce>] make_pages_present+0x7b/0x90
 [<c045f06a>] sys_remap_file_pages+0x2de/0x330
 [<c0404f0e>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 [<c0620000>] ioctl_standard_call+0x209/0x2ce

Very helpful, thanks.  Guru, please try the appended patch, I think
you'll find it fixes it for you (it did for me, once I'd puzzled out
why I was failing to reproduce the problem - tests on ext3 don't work).
Thank you so much for reporting this just in time!


[PATCH] fix sys_remap_file_pages BUG at highmem.c:15!

Gurudas Pai reports kernel BUG at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:15! below
sys_remap_file_pages, while running Oracle database test on x86 in 6GB RAM:
kunmap thinks we're in_interrupt because the preempt count has wrapped.

That's because __do_fault expected to unmap page_table, but one of its two
callers do_nonlinear_fault already unmapped it: let do_linear_fault unmap
it first too, and then there's no need to pass the page_table arg down.

Why have we been so slow to notice this?  Probably through forgetting
that the mapping_cap_account_dirty test means that sys_remap_file_pages
nowadays only goes the full nonlinear vma route on a few memory-backed
filesystems like ramfs, tmpfs and hugetlbfs.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

--- 2.6.23-rc9/mm/memory.c    2007-07-26 19:49:58.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/mm/memory.c    2007-10-04 15:42:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -2307,13 +2307,14 @@ oom:
  * do not need to flush old virtual caches or the TLB.
  *
  * We enter with non-exclusive mmap_sem (to exclude vma changes,
- * but allow concurrent faults), and pte mapped but not yet locked.
+ * but allow concurrent faults), and pte neither mapped nor locked.
  * We return with mmap_sem still held, but pte unmapped and unlocked.
  */
 static int __do_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-        unsigned long address, pte_t *page_table, pmd_t *pmd,
+        unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
         pgoff_t pgoff, unsigned int flags, pte_t orig_pte)
 {
+    pte_t *page_table;
     spinlock_t *ptl;
     struct page *page;
     pte_t entry;
@@ -2327,7 +2328,6 @@ static int __do_fault(struct mm_struct *
     vmf.flags = flags;
     vmf.page = NULL;
- pte_unmap(page_table);
     BUG_ON(vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP);
if (likely(vma->vm_ops->fault)) {
@@ -2468,8 +2468,8 @@ static int do_linear_fault(struct mm_str
             - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff;
     unsigned int flags = (write_access ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0);
- return __do_fault(mm, vma, address, page_table, pmd, pgoff,
-                            flags, orig_pte);
+    pte_unmap(page_table);
+    return __do_fault(mm, vma, address, pmd, pgoff, flags, orig_pte);
 }
@@ -2552,9 +2552,7 @@ static int do_nonlinear_fault(struct mm_
     }
pgoff = pte_to_pgoff(orig_pte);
-
-    return __do_fault(mm, vma, address, page_table, pmd, pgoff,
-                            flags, orig_pte);
+    return __do_fault(mm, vma, address, pmd, pgoff, flags, orig_pte);
 }
/*

Yes, indeed this patch worked for me , test completed successfully!! (on preempt kernel). Will continue testing with non-preempt kernel and update you if I hit any issue.

Completed testing on non-preempt successfully without any issue.

Thanks,
-Guru
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux