Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers

On 10/04/2007 07:58 PM, William Cattey wrote:
> 
> Sadly, the effect of the patch is the same as the most recent candidate
> patch from Jeremy Fitzhardinge:  The EDID transfer still comes up all
> zeros.
> 

I think maybe a better question is: why does read_edid still work?
The X server might be making some invalid assumption about system
state. Comparing the code the two programs use could provide some clues.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers
    • From: William Cattey <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 -- powerpc rtas panic
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc9-git2: Known regressions from 2.6.22
• Previous by thread: Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers
• Next by thread: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]