> hm. At no point in this patch series does anything actually get added to
> these lists, so this patch is presently a no-op.
>
> I'll assume that it will get used later. But it is a bit odd to add
> infrastructure in a patch series, then not use it. Why not hold the patch
> back and include it in the patch series which actually uses these lists for
> something?
My stupidity. I somehow thought the patch does actually do something
interesting when including it in this series, instead of holding it
back for the writable-mmap series.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
