Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

On 10/04/2007 04:55 PM, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Anything, I do mean anything, can be simulated using small test
> programs.

How do you simulate reading 100TB of data spread across 3000 disks,
selecting 10% of it using some criterion, then sorting and summarizing
the result?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
    • From: [email protected] (Matthew Wilcox)
  • Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] remove throttle_vm_writeout()
• Previous by thread: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
• Next by thread: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]