Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] x86: fix IO write barriers

>  > > "Worth about 10-20% performance" according to the 2.4.18pre9-ac4
>  > > release notes: http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-02-14-015-20-NW-KN
>  > 
>  > Are there numbers for a newer kernel available too?
> 
> no idea, my winchips died about 5 years ago

Got a couple here just need a mainboard 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [rfc][patch 1/3] x86_64: fence nontemproal stores
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] x86: fix IO write barriers
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] x86: fix IO write barriers
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] x86: fix IO write barriers
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] x86: fix IO write barriers
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
• Next by Date: Re: Vague maybe ppp-related panic report for 2.6.23-rc9
• Previous by thread: Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] x86: fix IO write barriers
• Next by thread: [rfc][patch 3/3] x86: optimise barriers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]