Re: [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack

On Thursday 04 October 2007 05:59:48 Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra has recently demonstrated that we can have order 1 allocation
> failures under memory pressure with small memory configurations. The
> x86_64 stack has a size of 8k and thus requires a order 1 allocation.

We've known for ages that it is possible. But it has been always so rare
that it was ignored.

Is there any evidence this is more common now than it used to be?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [00/18] Virtual Compound Page Support V2
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Xilinxfb: add of_platform bus binding
• Previous by thread: [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack
• Next by thread: Re: [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]