Re: CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo) in examples

On Oct 4 2007 11:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
>diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
>index 7f1730f..1595a45 100644
>--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
>+++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
>@@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ used for indentation, and the above exam
> 
> Get a decent editor and don't leave whitespace at the end of lines.
> 
>+Bitfield variables should be indented like this:
>+
>+	unsigned int foo :1;

Current code uses foo:1.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo) in examples
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo) in examples
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: vm.txt: document min_free_pages as critical for correctness
• Next by Date: sysrq docs: document sequence that actually works
• Previous by thread: CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo) in examples
• Next by thread: Re: CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo) in examples
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]