Re: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:20:43PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Just make the __pid_nr() etc functions that expect the argument
>> to always be not NULL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
> 
>>  static inline pid_t pid_nr(struct pid *pid)
>>  {
>>  	pid_t nr = 0;
>>  	if (pid)
>> -		nr = pid->numbers[0].nr;
>> +		nr = __pid_nr(pid);
>>  	return nr;
>>  }
> 
> Is there a patch that removes these inlines? Otherwise this looks good
> to me.

Not yet. Some of are uninlined already, but others are not. I'd like 
to make some testing before uninline them.

> --
> Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux