On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:06:32 +0200 Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04 2007, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > > Huh? Isn't the block layer supposed to fill in the entire thing? > > (i.e. current contents shouldn't matter) > > Yeah, but sg chaining requires that ->page be filled in properly or it > could confuse it. I think I'll add some debugging to catch that. > I assume sg_init_one() still can work on an uninitialized sg entry? Rgds Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- References:
- 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- From: Don Mullis <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- Prev by Date: Root on drbd and /etc on a cd-rw: What do you think about that?
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc8 build failure: __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much in dmi_id_init
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: OOPS in mmc on boot
- Index(es):
 |