* Mike Kravetz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > if (rq->curr && p && rq && _need_resched())
> > trace_special_pid(p->pid, PRIO(p), PRIO(rq->curr));
>
> Not an issue with the patch, just that last bit of code pulled in for
> context. I don't think it is a bug, but the checking of 'rq' after
> checking 'rq->curr' just doesn't look right (or necessary). Could it
> just be an artifact from earlier versions of the code?
yeah, you are right - and rq shouldnt ever be NULL there anyway.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
