Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 10:37 +0100, Chris Malley wrote:
Hi guys
Would it not be clearer to #include <asm/bootparam.h> and use
the relevant named members of struct setup_header / struct boot_params
rather than the hard-coded values 0x202, 0x1F1, 0x214 ?
Yes, but unfortunately bootparam.h wasn't designed to be included from
userspace.
The patch would look like this, but it makes me wonder if it'd be better
to put all these user-exposed types in bootparam.h and have the other
headers include them. hpa?
I don't have a strong preference either way, but I think what you have
here is fine.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
