On 10/3/07, Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > But now (correct me if I'm wrong here) cgroups has a per-cgroup task > list, and the above loop has cost linear in the number of tasks > actually in the cgroup, plus (unfortunate but necessary and tolerable) > the cost of taking a global css_set_lock, right? Yes. > > And I take it the above code snipped is missing the cgroup_iter_start, > correct? Oops, yes. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 7/8] scsi: megaraid_sas - support for poll_mode_io (reduced interrupt)
- Next by Date: [PATCH] RCU torture update for preemption
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
- Index(es):
 |