Chris Malley wrote:
Hi guysWould it not be clearer to #include <asm/bootparam.h> and use the relevant named members of struct setup_header / struct boot_paramsrather than the hard-coded values 0x202, 0x1F1, 0x214 ?
Yes, please. I have a patch in -mm which already does that across the kernel.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0/5] Boot protocol changes
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/5] update boot spec to 2.07
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/5] add WEAK() for creating weak asm labels
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 3/5] i386: paravirt boot sequence
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 4/5] Revert lguest magic and use hook in head.S
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 5/5] lguest: loading bzImage directly
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] lguest: loading bzImage directly
- From: Chris Malley <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/5] Boot protocol changes
- Prev by Date: Re: [bug] crash when reading /proc/mounts (was: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] allow drivers to flush in-flight DMA v2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lguest: loading bzImage directly
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lguest: loading bzImage directly
- Index(es):
 |