Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters

On 10/03/2007 12:10 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we can/should merge the doc files along with the x86 arch merge.
>>
> 
> Well, the x86 merge is pretty much mechanical.  It should be followed up
> with a lot of manual merging.
> 

It would be really nice if identical kernel parameters used the same names,
so people didn't waste their time trying e.g. "nolapic_timer" on x86_64
because that option fixed their problems on i386 (it's "noapictimer" in
x86_64.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [GIT PULL] Blackfin fixing for 2.6.23-rc9
Next by Date: Re: [bug] crash when reading /proc/mounts (was: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]