Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> 
> > The only change is in 2 consecutive columns: "2911 502" -> "2912 500".
> > Is processor usage calculated from those? Can someone explain how?
> 
> The latter seems to be utime ...decreasing. No wonder if arithmetics will 
> give strange results (probably top is using unsigned delta?)...

Hmm, minor miscounting from my side, stime seems more appropriate...

-- 
 i.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)
    • From: Frans Pop <[email protected]>

• References:
  • top displaying 9999% CPU usage
    • From: Frans Pop <[email protected]>
  • Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
    • From: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <[email protected]>
  • Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
    • From: Frans Pop <[email protected]>
  • Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
    • From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
• Next by Date: Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
• Previous by thread: Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
• Next by thread: Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]