James Morris wrote: > I'm pretty sure that the singly linked list idea has been rejected a few > times. Just use the existing API. Too bad... Well, is there a way to avoid read_lock when reading list? Currently, TOMOYO Linux avoids read_lock, on the assumption that (1) First, ptr->next is initialized with NULL. (2) Later, ptr->next is assigned non-NULL address. (3) Assigning to ptr->next is done atomically. Regards. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: KaiGai Kohei <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- References:
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
- Next by Date: Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
- Previous by thread: Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- Next by thread: Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
- Index(es):
 |