Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> These are what I'm worried about, and things like kswapd, pdflush,
> could definitely use a huge amount of CPU.
> 
> If you are interested in hard partitioning the system, you most
> definitely want these things to be balanced across the non-isolated
> CPUs.

But these guys are pinned anyway (or else they would already be moved
into a smaller load balanced cpuset), so why waste time load balancing
what can't move?

And on some of the systems I care about, we don't want to load balance
these guys; rather we go to great lengths to see that they don't run at
all when we don't want them to.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux