Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/10/2007, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> * Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > here is a few patches on top of the recent 'sched-dev':
> >
> > (1) [ proposal ] make timeslices of SCHED_RR tasks constant and not
> > dependent on task's static_prio;
> >
> > (2) [ cleanup ] calc_weighted() is obsolete, remove it;
> >
> > (3) [ refactoring ] make dequeue_entity() / enqueue_entity()
> > and update_stats_dequeue() / update_stats_enqueue() look similar, structure-wise.
> 
> thanks - i've applied all 3 patches of yours.
> 
> > (compiles well, not functionally tested yet)
> 
> (it boots fine here and SCHED_RR seems to work - but i've not tested
> getinterval.)

/me is guilty... it was a bit broken :-/ here is the fix.

results:

(SCHED_FIFO)

dimm@earth:~/storage/prog$ sudo chrt -f 10 ./rr_interval 
time_slice: 0 : 0

(SCHED_RR)

dimm@earth:~/storage/prog$ sudo chrt 10 ./rr_interval 
time_slice: 0 : 99984800

(SCHED_NORMAL)

dimm@earth:~/storage/prog$ ./rr_interval 
time_slice: 0 : 19996960

(SCHED_NORMAL + a cpu_hog of similar 'weight' on the same CPU --- so should be a half of the previous result)

dimm@earth:~/storage/prog$ taskset 1 ./rr_interval 
time_slice: 0 : 9998480


Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>

---
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index d835cd2..cce22ff 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4745,11 +4745,12 @@ long sys_sched_rr_get_interval(pid_t pid, struct timespec __user *interval)
 	else if (p->policy == SCHED_RR)
 		time_slice = DEF_TIMESLICE;
 	else {
+		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
 		unsigned long flags;
 		struct rq *rq;
 
 		rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
-		time_slice = sched_slice(&rq->cfs, &p->se);
+		time_slice = NS_TO_JIFFIES(sched_slice(cfs_rq_of(se), se));
 		task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
 	}
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);

---



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux