On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The SCSI maintainer wants to wait until 2.6.25 for this obvious data
That's 2.6.24 ... and that's not what I said. I said I wanted to take
it via scsi-misc into 2.6.24 and then take it via the stable tree for
2.6.23.x
> corruption fix.
>
> I vehemently disagree.
Sure, I'll state my case: This is a bug, but it has no affected users,
nor will it because the aic94xx doesn't work on non-x86 architectures by
reason of other longstanding bugs (and TODEVICE/FROMDEVICE only matters
to architecures which use dma_map_sg to program the IOMMU). Given that
we're at -rc9 and counting every patch towards stabilisation, I see no
benefit to adding this to the tree because the benefit to users is zero
and the detriment from code churn at this stage is potentially non-zero.
My recommendation is still to follow what I propose: take it via
scsi-misc to 2.6.24-rc1 and then back to 2.5.23.x
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
