On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> #
> # slub && antifrag
> #
> have-kswapd-keep-a-minimum-order-free-other-than-order-0.patch
> only-check-absolute-watermarks-for-alloc_high-and-alloc_harder-allocations.patch
> slub-exploit-page-mobility-to-increase-allocation-order.patch
> slub-reduce-antifrag-max-order.patch
>
> I think this stuff is in the "mm stuff we don't want to merge" category.
> If so, I really should have dropped it ages ago.
I agree. I spent a while last week bisecting down to see why my heavily
swapping loads take 30%-60% longer with -mm than mainline, and it was
here that they went bad. Trying to keep higher orders free is costly.
On the other hand, hasn't SLUB efficiency been built on the expectation
that higher orders can be used? And it would be a twisted shame for
high performance to be held back by some idiot's swapping load.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
