On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 02 Oct 2007 08:18:17 +0200 Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The clockevents patches are not included in this; but given the
> > > recent trouble i'm not 100% sure they are even ready yet.
>
> i'm curious, which "recent trouble" do you refer to? (The NMI watchdog
> bug [which is off by default] was fixed quickly. The C1E bug was found
> and fixed quickly. Anything else i missed?)
C1e and now the misrouted irq 0s Thomas reported.
Also i'm a little worried about the missing C1e check; it looks
like it needs a re-review to make sure not other infrastructure was
missing.
>
> > hm, well, I hope you and Thomas are on the same page regarding
> > precisely what the remaining issues are.
>
> i'd like to see the 64-bit clockevents (& dynticks) patches merged.
> Demand from users and distros is high.
I'm aware of that. No argument on that it will eventually go in.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
