Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Ah.  So the already-dropped
> slub-exploit-page-mobility-to-increase-allocation-order.patch was the
> culprit?

Yes without that patch SLUB will no longer take special action if antifrag 
is around.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-10-01-04-09.tar.gz uploaded
• Next by Date: Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-10-01-04-09.tar.gz uploaded
• Previous by thread: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
• Next by thread: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]