Re: [PATCH] Simplify yenta code

On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:56:55PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> Are BRIDGE_IO_MAX and BRIDGE_MEM_MAX guaranteed to be the same?

@#$%^&*. Red-faced, I withdraw the patch. Must be cross-eyed on
a Monday morning. Sorry.

--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Simplify yenta code
    • From: [email protected] (Linas Vepstas)
  • Re: [PATCH] Simplify yenta code
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386
• Next by Date: Re: linux cache routines for Write-back cache policy on MIPS24KE
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Simplify yenta code
• Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] Simplify yenta code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]