Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource

On Monday 01 October 2007 13:30:12 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So far I still maintain i386 and x86-64. If Thomas wants to take both
> > over completely he can do that; but I won't bother handling any patches i didn't 
> > write then anymore.
> 
> 
> What does that mean?

What I wrote.

> Didn't we all agree that x86 and x86-64 are going to be merged?

I didn't agree no.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: linux cache routines for Write-back cache policy on MIPS24KE
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]