Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression

On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:30:52PM +0300, Denys wrote:
> 
> Already i did, and it didn't show real failure point.

There was no difference between the profile of the working kernel
and the high load kernel?  Perhaps you just have legitimate higher load?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
    • From: "Denys" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
    • From: "Denys" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Inconsistent mmap()/mremap() flags
• Next by Date: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-10-01-04-09.tar.gz uploaded
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]