Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)

Hi Oleg.
> 
> Today's kconfig was proposed and accepted in a very unpleasant
> circumstances, has very poor design, development and no working
> alternative (for 5+ years now).

I have read all your mails about this subject - but I still miss what
is so bad about current design.

Could you try to stay down on the earth and be very specific about
what you see as so bad in current design.
"With stay down on earth" I try to say that what I have read before
I could not dechiper so be specific, please.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Move the user namespace under the option
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] PCI hotplug : Switch to pci_get_bus_and_slot instead of deprecated pci_find_slot.
• Previous by thread: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
• Next by thread: Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]