* Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 19:11 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > good catch! A quick preliminary review of your patch indicates it's
> > > > > fine - and it might be v2.6.23 material.
> > > >
> > > > there's a symmetric bug in kernel/compat_futex.c too.
> > >
> > > True. I'll update the patch and send it again with the Acked-bys.
> >
> > thanks! Logistics-wise: given that v2.6.22 has this same bug too, it's
> > not a .23 regression per se and could in theory be merged after the
> > 2.6.23 release too, into 2.6.23.1.
>
> Here we go. Tested with current git and latest glibc tst-robust8 on
> s390-64, native and compat.
excellent! This patch too looks good to me. I booted and tested it on
x86 too (32-bit-native, 64-bit-native and 32-bit-compat-on-64-bit.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
