Paolo Ornati wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:05:17 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
I have this problem only with XFS, and even with XFS it goes away
mounting with "nobarrier"...
This last is an interesting datapoint.
I wonder if libata has a generic problem with NCQ + FLUSH CACHE.
What happens if you enable the 'fua' module parameter? (libata.fua on
kernel command line, if built in)
it isn't supported here:
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Did you actually try my suggestion?
That message is normal, because libata defaults to FUA==off.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
