Re: [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates

On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 03:56:38PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> It'd be a start just to revert CodingStyle to its original content and
> move the rest to CodingStyleReference.  But someone would want to skim
> through the CodingStyle history for any legimate corrections that we
> want to keep.

How about CodingStyleSuggestions?  And let's make it clear they are
suggestions, and not things that checkpatch should be flaming about
unless people request the all of the annoying associated false
positives via --spam-me-harder.  :-)

       	      	      	       			  - Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates
  - From: Erez Zadok <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates
  - From: Erez Zadok <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates
  - From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: bluetooth: hci_sysfs work queue problem
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Printing numbers in parentheses is fine
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]