On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:53:06 -0700 David Brownell wrote:
> > From [email protected] Sat Sep 29 11:40:17 2007
> >
> > Let's kill it, please. (i.e., ACK)
>
> But ... why? What value could needless parens provide?
Who says that needless parens could provide value?
> "Yet Another Subtle And Hard To Fix Source Of Bloat" is
> not a plus.
ISTM that we agree.
> I'd kind of think a change like this should have some
> positive motivation.
"Me, I agree that numbers in parens don't usually make sense for
kernel messages."
It's too trivial to be included in CodingStyle.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]